
by Daniel Hinds
Michael Amott has certainly done his fare share
for the metal community, serving time with Carcass through their best years,
then founding both Arch Enemy and Spiritual Beggars afterward. While
the latter takes a more retro approach, Arch Enemy are much more aggressive
and modern. Mixing classic metal riffing and technical ability with
modern death metal aesthetics, Arch Enemy have firmly established themselves
as one of the leaders in the scene.
With their third opus, Burning Bridges, recently
released in the States, it was a good time to tape Mr. Amott's brain for
some insight into his metallic creations…
What separates Burning Bridges from the previous
two Arch Enemy releases?
In my opinion and the band's opinion, this is by far our best effort,
production-wise and songwriting-wise. It just feels like it really
clicked this time. It's got a lot more going for it, in the songwriting
department especially. It's far more catchy than our previous two.
Just overall an improvement and that seems to be the overall reaction that
we're getting from the media in Japan and Europe, where it has been out
for a while already.
Was there a change in the song-writing process
for this one?
All the music is written by myself and my brother Chris and that was
the case in the past as well. I don't know if there was much of a
change, really. We just sat down and tried to write the most catchy
and brutal…the most interesting songs that we could come up with.
Just tried to focus on quality songwriting instead of… On the Stigmata
album, we got into a lot of the technical sort of stuff and maybe it was
a little bit too much. We're happy with the new approach that we've
got, where we go more straight to the point.
Is that a difficult balance, between the technical
side and the actual song itself?
I think it's got to be a really strong song. To me, it doesn't
matter what kind of music it is, as long as there is a good song there,
that's the most important thing. The same goes for the kind of music
that we're playing: it's got to be strong material, lots of hooks
and catchiness, but also to keep it interesting for ourselves and for the
fans, we throw in a lot of more progressive elements as well.
What are some of the lyrical themes covered on
this album?
Overall, I would say the lyrics are a little more personal than in
the past. There are a few songs on there, like "Dead End Side," "Burning
Bridges" and "Seed of Hate," that kind of is about life, relationships
- lots of negative stuff. I think it worked really well, writing
these kinds of lyrics, with the new material. It gave it a bit more
depth.
How did you pick "Burning Bridges" as the album
title?
The meaning is more on a personal level. Basically, everybody
burns a lot of bridges in their lives, with people and relationships, but
you just have to move on, go forward.
Do you consider Arch Enemy to be your main band?
I've got two bands and I divide my time quite equally between them,
which can be quite difficult with schedules and stuff. Arch Enemy
is definitely a real band, though - it's not a project or anything like
that. We're all committed to this band and we're going to be touring
in Europe for six weeks in Sept/Oct, then we go to Japan and there is talk
of bringing us over to the States with Nevermore possibly. We're
definitely going to do stuff to support this album, but I don't like to
think, 'This is my main band,' or, 'That's may main band,' you know.
I'm really dedicated to both of my bands.
When you write songs, do you write them specifically
for one band or the other?
Yeah, I think it's always quite obvious when a riff or a melody or
song idea should be used for one of the bands. The riffing style
is quite different from each other. They're both heavy bands, but
the style of riffing and arranging is quite different.
Have you written anything that falls completely
outside the scope of both bands?
Yeah, I've written stuff that's outside of that framework. Sometimes
I write stuff that is way to wimpy or whatever, like pretty little things
on the acoustic guitar or whatever. Things that will never be used
probably. But I usually find places to work in all my ideas, if they're
any good. That's the case with the song "Still the Wing" on the new
album. Me and Chris made this melody, the actual chorus of that song,
that's a major chord progression instead of a minor chord progression,
which is the normal thing for Arch Enemy and most metal bands. We
were like, maybe this sounds too positive, but we though, 'what the hell?'
It sounds good, why not use it? I think we got away with it…
(laughs)
I read somewhere that you prefer emotional guitar-players
to the technical ones. Who would you consider some of the best emotional
players?
I'm a big fan of guitar-players from the 70s and 80s. I haven't
really heard anything in the 90s that has blown me away completely.
I don't see myself as a totally original guitar-player or anything, but
I'm inspired by some of these guitar-players and I put that into a new
context. I like melodic players, basically, mostly hard rock or heavy
metal players. Frank Marino, Michael Schenker, Uli Jon Roth, Gary
Moore, John Sykes - very sort of traditional players. I'm not really
into jazz or fusion or anything like that. I mean, you have Yngwie
Malmsteen and you can't ignore his influence on everyone playing heavy
metal and hard rock over the last fifteen, twenty years. He started
a new style of guitar playing. I'm very much into older stuff, like
Ritchie Blackmore with Deep Purple, stuff like that. But a lot of
that stuff can be quite boring music, because these people's careers go
on and on and they don't write interesting material anymore. Obviously,
they are still fantastic players, but often I'll find myself listening
to their older albums. Everyone has a peak in their musical career
and it's going to happen to me as well. Oh, and you can't ignore
Tony Iommi, especially for the riffing style. I don't think there
would have been any heavy metal without the kind of riffs that he came
up with in the early 70s.
How old were you when you first started playing
guitar?
I think I was probably about fourteen when I started playing.
I bought a guitar when I was fourteen, but I didn't start seriously playing
until I was about sixteen. I just had this guitar lying around at
home and I learned to play a bit, but I couldn't find anybody else to play
with, so I didn't really develop my playing. From sixteen onward,
I started finding people to play with and I started getting more and more
into playing.
When did you decide to make it your career?
That just kind of happened, I didn't make that decision. In the
late 80s, I had my own death metal band here in Sweden, called Carnage.
We were very much into brutal death metal, everything being as brutal as
possible. We got a little deal and put an album out, but that wasn't
a career, it was just our love for music that made us play. Then
I got an offer to play with Carcass after they put out Symphonies of Sickness,
so I joined them and toured for the Symphonies of Sickness album, in the
States and Europe. Then later on, I recorded two albums with them.
Carcass were a band on the way up and the sales of that band made it into
a career for me, I guess. 'Oh, we're getting paid now,' where as
before I was working day jobs and stuff. I've had that ambition,
but I couldn't really see a career in it. In the late 80s, there
were now really successful bands in that style. I couldn't see the
kind of music I was playing becoming successful. Headbanger's Ball
and MTV over here was all like Warrant and Poison, there was no heavy stuff
being played. But then a few years later, the whole thing exploded
and obviously death metal came to a peak around '92. Grunge came
along and suddenly it was okay to play downtuned and dirty. I've
worked in record stores and stuff between gigs when I haven't had enough
money, but the last two years I've been able to just focus on the music,
which is really nice.
You did an Iron Maiden cover ("Aces High").
Was it difficult to choose one particular song?
We did it for Japanese tribute album that only came out in Japan.
We got involved at a really late date on that album and the guy from the
label really wanted us to do "Aces High" and we thought that would be cool,
so we didn't really think too much about it. We just went ahead and
did it and it turned out pretty cool, actually. It's never been available
in Europe or the States…it might be some day, I don't know.
So is Japan your biggest market?
Yeah, that is definitely true for us.
What do you attribute that to?
I don't know… We released an album called Black Earth in '96,
the first Arch Enemy album, and it did okay over there. It sold like
10,000 or 11,000. We went over there and supported Cathedral for
three shows and that was really cool and seemed to go down really well.
Then we released Stigmata over there and that sold 20,000 and we went over
and toured for that one, so it's just been growing. The new album
came out in May over there and has already done 30,000. With 30,000
albums sold, that makes Arch Enemy the biggest extreme metal band in the
Far East, which is pretty cool, if you don't count like Sepultura.
But we sell a lot more than a band like Fear Factory or Machine Head in
Japan. But that's the only place in the whole world where that will
ever happen! (laughs) I think the reason is just that Arch
Enemy embraced the metal of the 80s that they still love so much over there.
We just incorporate traditional heavy metal guitarwork into this death
metal sound. Death metal has never really made it big over there,
so it's still rather fresh to them. We have a lot of guitar solos
and me and my brother are both pretty well respected as players over there.
We have a lot of guitar deals and we're giving lessons in the guitar magazines
- a very different situation than here at home. (laughs)
Do you get treated differently by the fans and
the press in Japan?
Yeah, both the fans and the press are really, really different over
there, compared to Europe. The fans are a lot more into it - they
know all the lyrics, all the music. Like when we play the melody
lines and the solos, the crowd will be singing along to that. They're
just more dedicated. They know everything about you. If they
get into something, they totally get into it. At a show, there might
be a thousand kids, and they are all totally into Arch Enemy or whatever.
But they demand a lot as well. You just can't give them shit (laughs).
You can't go over there and play like shit and fuck up, because they notice
all that. The journalism is totally different from the Western journalism,
the metal press anyway. It's 100% focused on music. Over here,
the bigger magazines like Metal Hammer and Kerrang! are not focused on
the music. Like, there could be an interview in Metal Hammer or Kerrang!
over here with Marilyn Manson and it could be five pages long, but not
have one question about the music. But in Japan, the big magazines
know that the fans want to know about the music and they want to know EVERYTHING
about the music. They want to know about the recording, what influenced
you…so in a way, it's more like the underground press in the States and
Europe. They are genuinely into music, instead of like, 'Let's sell
a lot of copies by talking about somebody wants to rape a child on stage'
or whatever.
How involved are you in the business side of things
and have you done pretty well in terms of not getting ripped off?
I've been ripped off like everybody else, but it's been okay.
We just signed a management deal with a big company over called Sanctuary,
and they do like Helloween and Iron Maiden, stuff like that. So hopefully
things will get more organized now.
Are you interested in science-fiction, in terms
of books and movies?
Yeah, I love that kind of stuff, especially older science-fiction movies,
like late 60s and early 70s. Planet of the Apes, Soylent Green, Omega
Man, 2001, Rollerball - I love that kind of vision of the future that they
had then. Actually, most of these films are like set in the year
2000 or whatever and…that's like next year. (laughs) When I watch
movies like that I feel a bit fooled really, because it's a future that
is never going to happen. We're never going to have those cool, huge-screen
TVs covering the whole wall and all this cool furniture. (laughs)
We're not going to wear these really cool suits and stuff. It's sad,
it really is… (laughs)
It seems like those movies were a lot more imaginative
than current sci-fi films.
Oh definitely. The whole vibe then was more imaginative.
The concepts that they had then were really, really cool. A lot more
of the moves and books from that time that were science-fiction related
were a lot more original. It's not a like a bunch of aliens that
are going to come and kill everyone on earth, like Independence Day - that
really sucks. For me, that's not a science-fiction movie, it's a
Hollywood action movie that happens to be set in space. I like movies
like Rollerball, that have a really dark sort of atmosphere. They
were a lot more thoughtful and intelligent. But I don't think a movie
like that would do well commercially today, because it's too dark for people. |